Police BREACH Venezuelan Embassy in DC, Arrest Activists
The activists who were inside the embassy believe that Trump was wrong to recognize opposition leader Juan Guaido as the president of Venezuela, and that Nicolas Maduro was rightfully elected. Two police breaches later, the standoff is finally over. Watch how it finally concluded.
You Might also like
1 month ago
Entrepreneur Andrew Yang amassed an online following that turned quickly into a IRL coalition of people from all ages, backgrounds, and politis. Many of his supporters are worried about the “automation revolution” and the millions of jobs at stake. Sandi Bachom went on the ground for Subverse to find out why Yang appeals to his supporters.
2 weeks ago
According to the Chinese government, thirty years ago today, nothing happened in Tiananmen Square. But everywhere else, today marks the thirtieth anniversary of the deadly suppression of protests against the authoritarian policies of the Chinese Communist Government. In China, the event is known as the “June Fourth Incident,” though it has been effectively scrubbed from the internet in Mainland China. But for this anniversary, a controversial anonymous political cartoonist in China finally showed his face. This is just one of many dissidents, some of whom are taking risky measures to get around China’s Great Firewall to avoid censorship, despite some US companies helping the Chinese government.
If you’re unfamiliar, weeks of peaceful protests broke out after the death of a Communist leader who was pro-reform during a time of rapid social and economic change in the post-Mao country. Inflation and corruption were rampant, and college students demanded change. Despite the disorganization of the movement, the calls for more democracy, free speech, free press, and government accountability united about a million people in Tiananmen Square at the height of the protests. China’s leader at the time and Communist Party elders deemed the protests as a political threat and the State Council declared Martial law, sending three hundred thousand troops to Beijing. Early in the morning on June fourth, the troops advanced, killing both demonstrators and bystanders, many in their twenties and some younger, shocking the world. Although the official number of deaths is disputed, numbers are estimated to range from several hundred to thousands, with thousands more wounded. The international community and human rights organizations condemned the massacre but the Chinese government continued with the arrests of protesters and supporters of the movement. They suppressed more protests around China and expelled foreign journalists in order to control the coverage of the events. Officials who were believed to be sympathetic to the movement were demoted or purged, while police and security forces were strengthened. Progress within the government to promote more liberalized policies was halted, and the movement to end authoritarianism in China instead strengthened it.
The infamous Great Firewall of China is a combination of legislative actions that regulate internet access domestically. It’s actually called the “Golden Shield Project” by the Bureau of Public Information and Network Security Supervision. It falls under the “one country, two systems” principle, which means China’s special administrative regions like Hong Kong and Macau are not affected, but the internet use in those regions are still closely monitored. The firewall blocks a number of foreign sites, including Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, and Twitter. As a result, access to foreign information sources, internet tools, and mobile apps are limited, and companies are required to adhere to China’s strict internet regulations. China spends about one hundred eighty billion dollars a year on “domestic security.” This includes surveillance, police, and censorship tools. In 2014, a new government body called the Cyberspace Administration of China was established to be directly under President Xi Jinping’s control. This body exercises its control over the internet as a tool for surveillance and suppression. China’s tech giants used to rely on a combination of simple blacklists of banned words and teams of manual reviewers. They’re still in use, but big Chinese tech companies now have more powerful automation to help identify what to block. Tiananmen-related online content is blocked year-round in China, and for decades textbooks and state media have ignored and re-characterized the event to what’s now referred to as “the June fourth incident.” Each year’s anniversary shows signs that Chinese tech companies and the government are more meticulously policing the web. China’s popular search engine Baidu and social media platform WeChat block Tiananmen-related posts and webpages to comply with internet rules. Researchers from the University of Toronto reverse-engineered WeChat, revealing the code in a section of the app that filters images and detects banned images even if they’ve been edited. If a user tries to send the famous photo of “Tank Man” from the protests, the message may never actually reach its recipients. Since 2017, China has increased its crackdown on VPN providers and users, sending many to prison. Apple was forced to remove hundreds of VPN apps from their app store, but still, the number of citizens using VPNs is increasing.
According to Bloomberg, “in the first quarter of 2019, 35% of Chinese web users utilized a VPN, up from 31% two years ago, according to market research firm GlobalWebIndex. That compares with 60% of web users in Indonesia, the highest share of VPN users globally, and 22% in the US. More than half of Chinese VPN users do so for routine activities such as accessing better music and TV shows; 41% of them use VPNs to access social networks or blocked news sites.”
More and more Chinese citizens are breaking through the firewall to fight the censorship and communicate with other like-minded digital dissidents. Using open-source coding platforms like Github, and encrypted messaging services like Telegram and Signal, some are able to stay ahead of the Great Firewall, which continues to grow taller and wider. Some are now operating platforms that re-publish blocked social media posts, browsers that allow access to blocked sites, and blockchain based messaging that prevent controversial posts from being removed. Groups of activists are even teaching members of the persecuted Uighur Muslim-minority how to use encrypted messaging to speak with human rights groups.
US companies operating within China, like Apple and Microsoft, are helping the government censor information. The content deemed “sensitive” by the government is kept off Bing search results and LinkedIn. Other than removing hundreds of VPN apps, Apple curates its app store differently than anywhere else in the world to comply with the firewall. Human rights groups are accusing the companies of helping the government suppress rights. Lawmakers in the US and Europe have also criticized US companies for playing along with the censorship. In April, it was reported that Apple removed songs that mention political topics from Apple Music, including a song by Hong Kong pop star Jacky Chung that referenced the Tiananmen Square protests. Apple declined to comment on the reports of the music’s removal, prompting lawmakers to call the compliance disgraceful.
As we’ve reported before, Google was testing a search engine known as “Dragonfly” that would comply with the strict censorship rules of the Chinese government. The project caused an uproar within the company, with many protesting and petitioning for its development to end. Google actually used to operate within China until 2010, then stopped over concerns that the government was increasing its censorship of online speech too much.
One of the most prominent Chinese-born political cartoonists has been hiding behind anonymity for years to protect himself against repercussions from the government. Today, he revealed his identity. Badiucao is a thirty-three-year-old artist now living in Australia who circulates his work online through social media. He has been compared to Banksy because of the political commentary in his art that satirize Beijing’s leaders. Despite threats from the Chinese government, he stepped out of the shadows to show his face.
In the past, Badiucao would cover his face when he had to appear in public, or sometimes cross-dress to conceal his identity. Despite taking these measures, Chinese authorities figured out his identity and he was forced to cancel an exhibition in Hong Kong over threats to his loved ones. Badiucao believes his identity was realized through digital surveillance while preparing the exhibition in Hong Kong.
According to Reuters, Badiucao said, “I’m facing this major choice: to be silent forever, or to fight back, to confront, face to face, this situation. By stepping out on the anniversary of the Tiananmen massacre I don’t think there’s any better time for me to do that.”
The canceled art exhibition in Hong Kong was called “Gongle,” stylized to parody Google, but based on a phrase that translates to “singing for Communism.” The show included drawings celebrating a series of street protests known as the “Umbrella Movement” against China’s interference in Hong Kong’s electoral system in 2014. It featured an image portraying Xi Jinping as Winnie the Pooh in a meme-reference mocking the leader’s appearance. The meme is blocked in China. He also made pictures of Google CEO Sundar Pichai wearing a “Make Wall Great Again” hat, referencing the Great Firewall and the Dragonfly search engine.
Badiucao seeks to reveal the truth about June fourth through art, and said, “In order to pass down memory, it’s always about the next generation, how to engage them, how to awaken them from this kind of political indifference. The physical body can be crushed or damaged, but the spirit lives for much longer. I hope within my art and within my action [there] will be a way to pass on the spirit of ‘89.”
It’s been thirty years since the protests against the authoritarian policies of the Chinese government, the surveillance and censorship has gotten worse, and people are still intimidated and jailed for simple expressions of dissent. It’s a stark reminder that even though we certainly don’t have it bad here in the US, we still need to closely monitor the actions of our governments and tech companies to ensure our freedom of expression does not become compromised. We will continue to update you with news on topics like this, so be sure to stay tuned for more videos every Monday through Thursday. But soon, we’ll have videos every day. You can help make this possible by supporting our work and sharing our videos.
Dissident Chinese cartoonist shows his face on Tiananmen anniversary
digital dissidents fighting chinese censorship machine
US companies help censor internet in china
1 week ago
Today, we’re looking at the impact these antitrust investigations had on the stock of the silicon valley giants. We’re also going to show you what the investigations from the Department of Justice, Federal Trade Commission, and the House Judiciary Committee have in store for the companies.
Morgan Stanley predicts that in a worst “bear case” scenario, Apple’s stock could fall to one hundred forty-seven dollars per share from antitrust regulations and tariffs on goods from China. Their “base case” for Apple is two hundred thirty-one dollars per share but they expect tariffs to take up to seventy-one off that, and the antitrust regulation worst-case impact could take another thirteen dollars out per share. The note from Morgan Stanley to investors addressed the recent reports that the Department of Justice might investigate anti-competitive behavior by Apple, which could cost them tens of billions of dollars in equity value. The analyst who wrote the note, Katy Huberty said the likely focus of the investigation is Spotify’s accusation of anti-competitive actions favoring Apple Music over third-party apps. Apple is already facing potential investigation by the EU on this accusation stemming from a complaint from Spotify. EU prosecutors have not yet announced what action they will take, but the scrutiny itself sets a precedent. If regulators go after the App Store, Huberty says the extreme scenario would be the company cuts its revenue from developers in half. Huberty also said that Apple’s take rate starting in 2020 would equate to lost revenue of nine point five billion dollars.
These are hypothetical projections until the DOJ takes action, but Apple CEO Tim Cook is already addressing the potential outcome. In an interview with CBS News on Monday, Cook said, “I think we should be scrutinized. But any kind of measure about ‘is Apple a monopoly or not,’ I don’t think anybody reasonable is going to come to the conclusion that Apple’s a monopoly. Our share is much more modest. We don’t have a dominant position in any market.”
Based on a report from the International Data Corporation’s Worldwide Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker, Apple’s shipments in the first quarter of 2019 dropped thirty percent from last year, lagging behind Samsung and Huawei. “The iPhone struggled to win over consumers in most major markets as competitors continue to eat away at Apple’s market share. Price cuts in China throughout the quarter along with favorable trade-in deals in many markets were still not enough to encourage consumers to upgrade. Combine this with the fact that most competitors will shortly launch 5G phones and new foldable devices, the iPhone could face a difficult remainder of the year.”
The iPhone is not the focus of the investigation though. App developers have taken issue with the App store, accusing them of unfairly limiting rivals to their services. As we reported recently, the Supreme Court ruled that consumers should be allowed to bring lawsuits against the company over inflating the price of apps by taking thirty percent commission. Apple isn’t the only tech giant whose stocks are in jeopardy pending an antitrust investigation. Alphabet took a major hit, falling to its lowest in five months as the DOJ prepares a probe into Google. Like Apple, the probe will explore ‘anti-competitive conduct’ to see if Google is harming competition in the digital market. The indication of a probe made Alphabet stock plummet to its lowest since January at just over one thousand dollars per share. Google is currently one of the most profitable companies in history and has faced three separate antitrust investigations from the European Union since 2010. A team of Merrill Lynch analysts wrote a note to investors talking about the potential effects of an investigation by the DOJ. According to Bloomberg, Post said, “Potential implications for Google could include new regulations on business practices, or an antitrust probe leading to a breakup. It is very rare to break up a company but not unheard of.” Post thinks the investigation into Google would take at least five years, which would cause significant internal distractions, but would have a positive long-term effect on the company’s valuation and public perception. Analyst Ross Sandler of Barclays thinks the regulatory concerns are bad timing and Google is losing allies in Washington DC after siding with Democratic candidates who weren’t elected. While he thinks the investigation would be long and painful, he doesn’t believe it will result in the company being broken up.
After a report stating the FTC secured the rights to begin an antitrust investigation into Facebook, the NASDAQ composite fell one point six percent, putting it down more than ten percent from its May record low. The statement came after a bipartisan letter urging the FTC to take antitrust action addressing the huge market shares Google and Facebook have in search and advertising, as well as concerns over privacy. Republicans have also pushed for action based on the size and influence the companies have over speech online and allegations of stifling conservative voices– which the companies deny. Despite the growing concern from lawmakers and the public over the market dominance, both Facebook and Google products are extremely popular to consumers.
Makan Delrahim, the Justice Department’s antitrust chief has said there’s nothing wrong with these companies achieving market dominance through innovation. According to the Wall Street Journal, Delrahim said in a speech about digital platforms last year at the University of Chicago, “Antitrust enforcers may need to take a close look to see whether competition is suffering and consumers are losing out on new innovations as a result of misdeeds by a monopoly incumbent.” The antitrust chief answers to US Attorney General William Barr, who shared similar feelings with senators during his confirmation hearings in January, saying: “I don’t think big is necessarily bad, but I think a lot of people wonder how such huge behemoths that now exist in Silicon Valley have taken shape under the nose of the antitrust enforcers. You can win that place in the marketplace without violating the antitrust laws, but I want to find out more about that dynamic.”
The House Judiciary Committee announced its own investigation into the digital market competition, which will include hearings and information requests. The probe will also determine if the current US antitrust laws and enforcement have been able to keep up with changes in technology. According to the Wall Street Journal, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee Jerrold Nadler said, “The open internet has delivered enormous benefits to Americans, but there is growing evidence that a handful of gatekeepers have come to capture control over key arteries of online commerce, content, and communications.”
Last year, internet industries including Google, Amazon, and Facebook put a record seventy-seven point nine million dollars into lobbying in Washington DC. Alphabet spent over twenty-one million, Amazon spent over fourteen million, and Facebook spent over twelve million.
The Silicon Valley giants have also spent years building their support network in Washington DC and other areas around the country and have funded nonprofit antitrust groups across the political spectrum. A Google transparency report showed that the company funded more than thirty nonprofit groups that are in the public antitrust debate. Amazon’s investment list shows they fund many of the same groups. The FTC has been ramping up its scrutiny in recent months, announcing a task force in February that would re-evaluate past government decisions that allowed tech companies to acquire smaller companies that would have been future competitors. One of these deals is Facebook’s acquisitions of WhatsApp and Instagram. Tech advocates are arguing that actions taken against the industry giants could hurt consumers and the economy, as well as stifle growth and innovation. FTC Chairman Joe Simons is eager to figure out how the tech giants have been able to sway large parts of the economy and society.
According to the Wall Street Journal, Simons said in a speech to Georgetown University last year: “It makes sense for the antitrust authorities to look in places where there might be significant market power, to ensure that such firms compete on the merits—and that might include some of the significant high-tech platforms.”
The FTC has spent over a year investigating privacy issues and how Facebook handles user data, but that probe didn’t focus on issues of competition. Because the jurisdictional agreements between the DOJ and FTC didn’t assign a single agency the right to oversee one company for each issue, they will clear each other to work on specified issues.
These investigations are going to take lots of time, and the companies are going to stay on their toes and continue to further their interests. The outcome won’t just affect the companies– consumers and emerging tech companies will reap the consequences or the benefits, depending on how it plays out, which is why it’s so important to keep up on developments. We’ll have those updates and more here so be sure to check back for more videos. We have new videos every Monday through Thursday at 7pm, and soon we’ll be expanding our coverage to get more news to you every day of the week. You can help us out by showing your support and sharing our videos and leaving your thoughts in the comments.
DoJ plans probe for Apple
The DoJ Antitrust Division and the FTC met in recent weeks forming an agreement to give jurisdiction to undertake potential antitrust probes of Apple and Google, owned by Alphabet Inc.
DoJ has jurisdiction for a potential probe of Apple, and the FTC was given jurisdiction to look at Amazon.com Inc and Facebook Inc according to sources.
Companies like Spotify have criticized the iPhone maker’s practices, describing the company as anti-competitive in a complaint to the European Union’s antitrust regulators.
Central to Spotify’s complaint is the 30% fee Apple charges to content-based service providers to use Apple’s in-app purchase system.
The company has defended its practices, saying it only collects a commission if a good or service is sold through an app.
“Our users trust Apple – and that trust is critical to how we operate a fair, competitive store for developer app distribution,” Apple stated previously.
On Monday, the Wall Street Journal reported that the FTC will examine how Facebook’s practices affect digital competition.
The Washington Post reported over the weekend that Amazon will be probed by U.S. regulators, on Friday, the Journal reported that the DoJ is preparing a probe of Google, sending shares of parent company Alphabet down 7% Monday.
The ‘Apple tax’ accounts for a considerable amount of Apple’s services revenue, but draws angers developers who compete with Apple’s self-manufactured apps in their store.
Apple antitrust woes could worsen as US ponders major tech giant investigation
Apple shutting down iTunes
Alphabet stock drops from antitrust
FTC & DoJ plan on investigating deeper on antitrust
Explainer: Should Big Tech fear U.S. antitrust enforcers?
Google, Amazon, Facebook and Apple Could Face Antitrust Investigations. How Do Those Work?
Antitrust Troubles Snowball for Tech Giants as Lawmakers Join In
DoJ plans probe for Google